Intraoperative consultation of vascular surgeons is increasing at a major American trauma center.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgeons are often called to aid other surgical specialties for complex exposure, hemorrhage control, or revascularization. The evolving role of the vascular surgeon in the management of intraoperative emergencies involving trauma patients remains undefined. The primary aims of this study included determining the prevalence of intraoperative vascular consultation in trauma, describing how these interactions have changed over time, and characterizing the outcomes achieved by vascular surgeons in these settings. We hypothesized that growing endovascular capabilities of vascular surgeons have resulted in an increased involvement of vascular surgery faculty in the management of the trauma patient over time. METHODS: A retrospective review of all operative cases at a single level I trauma center where a vascular surgeon was involved, but not listed as the primary surgeon, between 2002 and 2017 was performed. Cases were abstracted using Horizon Surgical Manager, a documentation system used in our operating room to track staff present, the type of case, and use. All elective cases were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 256 patients initially identified, 22 were excluded owing to the elective or joint nature of the procedure, leaving 234 emergent operative vascular consultations. Over the 15-year study period, a 529% increase in the number of vascular surgery consultations was seen, with 65% (n = 152) being intraoperative consultations requiring an immediate response. Trauma surgery (n = 103 [44%]) and orthopedic surgery (n = 94 [40%]) were the most common consulting specialties, with both demonstrating a trend of increasing consultations over time (general surgery, 1400%; orthopedic surgery, 220%). Indications for consultation were extremity malperfusion, hemorrhage, and concern for arterial injury. The average operative time for the vascular component of the procedures was 2.4 hours. Of patients presenting with ischemia, revascularization was successful in 94% (n = 116). Hemorrhage was controlled in 99% (n = 122). In-hospital mortality was relatively low at 7% (n = 17). Overall, despite the increase in intraoperative vascular consultations over time, a concomitant increase in the proportion of procedures done using endovascular techniques was not seen. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons are essential team members at a level I trauma center. Vascular consultation in this setting is often unplanned and often requires immediate intervention. The number of intraoperative vascular consultations is increasing and cannot be attributed solely to an increase in endovascular hemorrhage control, and instead may reflect the declining experience of trauma surgeons with vascular trauma. When consulted, vascular surgeons are effective in quickly gaining control of the situation to provide exposure, hemorrhage control, or revascularization.

[Tranexamic acid: widely applicable, few risks]. / Tranexaminezuur: breed toepasbaar, weinig risico's.

Tranexamic acid is a cheap and easy to use drug for the treatment and prevention of bleeding. In the past, its use was mainly empiric and primarily in patients with coagulation disorders. More recently, large scale randomized controlled trials have shown that tranexamic acid reduces mortality in women with postpartum hemorrhage and in victims of trauma. In a number of surgical settings, including cardiothoracic and orthopedic, tranexamic acid reduces bleeding complications. In these studies, there was no signal of increased risk of thrombosis. Tranexamic acid is also effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding, the prevention of bleeding after dental interventions and a number of other high-prevalence conditions. There are no data that support an increased risk of thrombosis when patients without haemostatic disorders use tranexamic acid for a longer period, but addition studies would be helpful. Finally, the topical administration of the drug for mucocutaneous nuisance bleeds deserves more attention.

Advances in surgical hemostasis: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis on topical tranexamic acid in spinal deformity surgery.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an effective and commonly used hemostatic agent for perioperative blood loss in various surgical specialties. It is being increasingly used in spinal deformity surgery. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical TXA (tTXA) compared to both placebo and/or intravenous (IV) TXA in patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery. We conducted a systematic review of the electronic databases using different MeSH terms from January 1970 to August 2019. Pooled and subgroup analysis was performed using fixed and random-effect model based upon the heterogeneity (I2). A total of 609 patients (tTXA: n = 258, 42.4%) from 8 studies were included. We found that there was a statistically significant difference in terms of (i) postoperative blood loss [mean difference (MD) - 147.1, 95% CI - 189.5 to - 104.8, p < 0.00001], (ii) postoperative hemoglobin level (MD 1.09, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.72, p = 0.0008), (iii) operative time (MD 7.47, 95% CI 2.94 to 12.00, p < 0.00001), (iv) postoperative transfusion rate [odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.78, p = 0.007], postoperative drain output (MD, - 184.0, 95% CI - 222.03 to - 146.04, p < 0.00001), and (v) duration of hospital stay (MD - 1.14, 95% CI - 1.44 to - 0.85, p < 0.00001) in patients treated with tTXA compared to the control group. However, there was no significant difference in terms of intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.13) and complications (p = 0.23) between the two comparative groups. Furthermore, low-dose (250-500 mg) tTXA (p < 0.00001) reduced postoperative blood loss more effectively compared to high-dose tTXA (1-3 g) (p = 0.001). Our meta-analysis corroborates the effectiveness and safety of tTXA in spinal deformity surgery.

Management and Outcomes of Isolated Axillary Artery Injury: A Five-Year National Trauma Data Bank Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate recent national trends in the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with isolated axillary artery injuries. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried to identify records submitted from 2011 to 2015 that contained an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for an injury to axillary artery (903.01) and an external cause of injury code indicating blunt or penetrating trauma. Records that contained a diagnosis code for an injury to an additional blood vessel (900.00-903.00, 903.2-904.9), an injury to a nonupper extremity or unclassifiable body region, or whose operative management could not be discerned were excluded. The final study sample included 221 patients with isolated axillary artery injury. The patient's clinical management was the primary outcome of interest. The study sample was stratified by trauma type, and descriptive statistics were performed on all variables. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of patients received operative management. Patients with penetrating injury were 24% more likely to be managed operatively than bluntly injured patients (76.9% vs. 62.1%, P = 0.0178). In operatively managed patients, the open repair rate was 82.8% and endovascular repair rate was 10.2%. Graft repair was performed most often (28.0%), followed by placement of a temporary intravenous shunt (17.8%) and surgical occlusion (10.2%). Surgical vessel occlusion was significantly more likely to be performed on patients with penetrating injury than with blunt injury (14.6% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.0124). Patients with penetrating injury had significantly shorter median emergency department length of stay (87.0 min vs. 152.0 min, P < 0.0001), intensive care unit length of stay (2.0 days vs. 3.0 days, P < 0.0388), hospital length of stay (4.0 days vs. 5.0 days, P = 0.0026), and time-to-operative management (1.6 hr vs. 3.9 hr, P < 0.001) compared to bluntly injured patients. Patients with blunt injury had a higher reportable in-hospital complication rate (13.8% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.0477). The overall mortality rate was 3.1% for isolated axillary artery injuries and did not significantly differ by trauma type. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary artery injury is more often caused by penetrating trauma. Despite introduction of novel endovascular techniques, the majority of patients with isolated axillary artery injury are managed using open repair. Penetrating axillary artery injury is significantly more likely to be managed using open repair and by surgical occlusion. Patients with blunt injury have higher complication rates and longer hospital length of stays. The mortality rate is lower than previously published.

A comprehensive review of topical hemostatic agents: The good, the bad, and the novel.

Uncontrolled exsanguination remains the leading cause of death for trauma patients, many of whom die in the pre-hospital setting. Without expedient intervention, trauma-associated hemorrhage induces a host of systemic responses and acute coagulopathy of trauma. For this reason, health care providers and prehospital personal face the challenge of swift and effective hemorrhage control. The utilization of adjuncts to facilitate hemostasis was first recorded in 1886. Commercially available products haves since expanded to include topical hemostats, surgical sealants, and adhesives. The ideal product balances efficacy, with safety practicality and cost-effectiveness. This review of hemostasis provides a guide for successful implementation and simultaneously highlights future opportunities.

Validation of an extrinsic compression and early ambulation protocol after diagnostic transfemoral cerebral angiography: a 5-year prospective series.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Access-site complications constitute a substantial portion of the morbidity associated with transfemoral cerebral angiography, yet no standardized protocol exists for femoral closure and practice patterns vary widely. The objective of this single-arm prospective cohort study was to validate the efficacy and safety of a standardized femoral closure strategy for all diagnostic angiography, regardless of antiplatelet regimen. METHODS: A single-arm, prospective study was designed enrolling consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic transfemoral cerebral angiography by a single neurointerventional surgeon from March 2013 - March 2018. The closure protocol consisted of 20 minutes of manual compression to the site of arterial access and 2 hours of bedrest. The primary outcome was hematoma or oozing after manual compression. Demographic, clinic, and laboratory data were collected and analyzed, and patients were stratified by antiplatelet use. RESULTS: Of 525 angiograms, 263 (50.1%) were on patients taking antiplatelet medication, with 66 (12.6%) on dual antiplatelet regimens. Five patients (0.95% of all patients) met the primary outcome: in all five cases, there was no further oozing or enlarging hematoma after the additional compression period. There were not significant differences in primary outcome in groups stratified by antiplatelet use, and there were no instances of delayed hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, or arteriovenous fistula. CONCLUSION: In this single-arm cohort study of 525 consecutive transfemoral angiograms with a standardized extrinsic compression protocol, hemostasis was achieved without complication in >99% regardless of antiplatelet strategy. This protocol is effective and safe for diagnostic transfemoral angiography regardless of a patient's antiplatelet use.

Contemporary transradial access practices: Results of the second international survey.

OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into current practice of transradial angiography and intervention in the United States and around the world. BACKGROUND: Transradial access (TRA) has grown worldwide. In a prior survey, there was significant practice variation and there was minimal US participation which limited the generalizability to US operators. METHODS: We used an internet-based survey software program to solicit input from practicing interventional cardiologists from the United States and around the world. US operators were compared with outside the United States (OUS) operators and respondent-level comparisons were made with the prior survey to assess for temporal changes in practice. RESULTS: Between August 2016 and January 1, 2017, 125 interventional cardiologists completed the survey representing 91 countries with the United States having 449 (39.9%) respondents. Preprocedure, noninvasive testing for collateral circulation is used more commonly in the United States (54.1%) than around the world (26.6%) but its use has decreased since 2010. In the US, 48.8% of operators never use ultrasound and 92.6% of OUS operators never use it; only 4.4% overall use ultrasound in >50% of cases. Use of bivalirudin has decreased in the US and OUS. Nearly, 30% of operators do not assess for radial artery patency following hemostasis. US respondents used TRA less commonly for primary PCI for STEMI than their global counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in how TRA procedures are performed including relatively low rates of adherence to practices that are known to improve outcomes. Further education aimed at increasing use of best practices will impact patient outcomes.

[Therapeutic antibodies in hemostasis. From the past to the future]. / Les anticorps thérapeutiques en hémostase - D'hier, d'aujourd'hui et de demain .

TITLE: Les anticorps thérapeutiques en hémostase - D'hier, d'aujourd'hui et de demain…. ABSTRACT: L'hémostase est un processus complexe qui implique de nombreux acteurs cellulaires et moléculaires. En pathologie, les thromboses d'une part, et les pathologies hémorragiques constitutionnelles dominées par l'hémophilie d'autre part, ont bénéficié ces dernières années du développement d'anticorps thérapeutiques qui révolutionnent aujourd'hui la prise en charge des malades.

Réspuesta de los autores: Anticoagulación en las técnicas de depuración extrarrenal continuas en pacientes críticos / Reply: Anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients

No disponible

[Clinical epidemiological characteristics and change trend of upper gastrointestinal bleeding over the past 15 years].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical epidemiology change trend of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) over the past 15 years. METHODS: Consecutive patients who was diagnosed as continuous UGIB in the endoscopy center of The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-Yat University during the period from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 1998 and the period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013 were enrolled in this study. Their gender, age, etiology, ulcer classification, endoscopic treatment and hospitalization mortality were compared between two periods. RESULTS: In periods from 1997 to 1998 and 2012 to 2013, the detection rate of UGIB was 9.99%(928/9 287) and 4.49%(1 092/24 318)(χ2=360.089, P=0.000); the percentage of male patients was 73.28%(680/928) and 72.44% (791/1 092) (χ2=0.179, P=0.672), and the onset age was (47.3±16.4) years and (51.4±18.2) years (t=9.214, P=0.002) respectively. From 1997 to 1998, the first etiology of UGIB was peptic ulcer bleeding, accounting for 65.2%(605/928)[duodenal ulcer 47.8%(444/928), gastric ulcer 8.3%(77/928), stomal ulcer 2.3%(21/928), compound ulcer 6.8%(63/928)],the second was cancer bleeding(7.0%,65/928), and the third was esophageal and gastric varices bleeding (6.4%,59/928). From 2012 to 2013, peptic ulcer still was the first cause of UGIB, but the ratio obviously decreased to 52.7%(575/1092)(χ2=32.467, P=0.000)[duodenal ulcer 31.9%(348/1092), gastric ulcer 9.4%(103/1092), stomal ulcer 2.8%(30/1092), compound ulcer 8.6%(94/1092)]. The decreased ratio of duodenal ulcer bleeding was the main reason (χ2=53.724, P=0.000). Esophageal and gastric varices bleeding became the second cause (15.1%,165/1 092, χ2=38.976, P=0.000), and cancer was the third cause (9.2%,101/1 092, χ2=3.352, P=0.067). The largest increasing amplitude of the onset age was peptic ulcer bleeding [(46.2±16.7) years vs. (51.9±18.9) years, t=-5.548, P=0.000), and the greatest contribution to the amplitude was duodenal ulcer bleeding [(43.4±15.9) years vs. (48.4±19.4) years, t=-3.935, P=0.000], while the onset age of esophageal and gastric varices bleeding [(49.8±14.1) years vs. (48.8±13.9) years, t=0.458, P=0.648] and cancer [(58.4±13.4) years vs. (58.9±16.7) years, t=-0.196, P=0.845] did not change significantly. Compared with the period from 1997 to 1998, the detection rate of high risk peptic ulcer rebleeding (Forrest stage I(a, I(b, II(a and II(b) increased (χ2=39.958, P=0.000) in the period from 2012 to 2013. From 1997 to 1998, 54 patients underwent endoscopic treatment, and the achievement ratio of hemostasis was 79.6% (43/54). From 2012 to 2013, 261 patients underwent endoscopic treatment and the achievement ratio of hemostasis was 96.9%(253/261), which was significantly higher (χ2=23.287, P=0.000). Compared to the period from 1997 to 1998, more patients with variceal bleeding or non-variceal bleeding received endoscopic treatment in time (39.0% vs. 70.3%, χ2=51.930, P=0.000; 3.6% vs. 15.6%, χ2=62.292, P=0.000, respectively), and higher ratio of patients staging Forrest stage I(a to II(b also received endoscopic treatment in the period from 2012 to 2013 [27.4%(26/95) vs. 68.5%(111/162), χ2=40.739, P=0.000]. More qualified endoscopic hemostatic techniques were used, containing thermocoagulation (0 vs. 15.2%, χ2=79.518, P=0.000), hemostatic clip (0 vs. 55.9%, χ2=20.879, P=0.000), hemostatic clip combined with thermocoagulation (4.3% vs. 16.4%, χ2=5.154, P=0.023), while less single injection was used (87.1% vs. 6.2%, χ2=10.420, P=0.001), and single spraying for hemostasis was completely abandoned in the period from 2012 to 2013. The ratio of inpatients undergoing reoperation decreased obviously in the period from 2012 to 2013 [9.3%(86/928) vs. 6.0%(65/1092), χ2=7.970, P=0.005], while no significant difference was found in mortality during hospitalization between two periods. CONCLUSION: Compared with the period from 1997 to1998, the mean onset age of UGIB increased, and the ratio of peptic ulcer bleeding decreased due to the reduction of duodenal ulcer bleeding, the detection rate of high risk peptic ulcer rebleeding increased, the cure rate of endoscopic treatment for UGIB increased, more reasonable and immediate hemostatic methods were used, but overall mortality did not change obviously in the period from 2012 to 2013.

Trends in 1029 trauma deaths at a level 1 trauma center: Impact of a bleeding control bundle of care.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade the age of trauma patients and injury mortality has increased. At the same time, many centers have implemented multiple interventions focused on improved hemorrhage control, effectively resulting in a bleeding control bundle of care. The objective of our study was to analyze the temporal distribution of trauma-related deaths, the factors that characterize that distribution and how those factors have changed over time at our urban level 1 trauma center. METHODS: Records at an urban Level 1 trauma center were reviewed. Two time periods (2005-2006 and 2012-2013) were included in the analysis. Mortality rates were directly adjusted for age, gender and mechanism of injury. The Mann-Whitney and chi square tests were used to compare variables between periods, with significance set at 0.05. RESULTS: 7080 patients (498 deaths) were examined in 2005-2006, while 8767 patients (531 deaths) were reviewed in 2012-2013. The median age increased 6 years, with a similar increase in those who died. In patients that died, no differences by gender, race or ethnicity were observed. Fall-related deaths are now the leading cause of death. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hemorrhage accounted for >91% of all deaths. TBI (61%) and multiple organ failure or sepsis (6.2%) deaths were unchanged, while deaths associated with hemorrhage decreased from 36% to 25% (p<0.01). Across time periods, 26% of all deaths occurred within one hour of hospital arrival, while 59% occurred within 24h. Unadjusted mortality dropped from 7.0% to 6.1 (p=0.01) and in-hospital mortality dropped from 6.0% to 5.0% (p<0.01). Adjusted mortality dropped 24% from 7.6% (95% CI: 6.9-8.2) to 5.8% (95% CI: 5.3-6.3) and in-hospital mortality decreased 30% from 6.6% (95% CI: 6.0-7.2) to 4.7 (95% CI: 4.2-5.1). CONCLUSIONS: Over the same time frame of this study, increases in trauma death across the globe have been reported. This single-site study demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality, attributable to decreased hemorrhagic death. It is possible that efforts focused on hemorrhage control interventions (a bleeding control bundle) resulted in this reduction. These changing factors provide guidance on future prevention and intervention efforts.

Management of gastric varices: a French national survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bleeding from gastric varices is more severe than that from esophageal varices, but its management remains debated. We aimed to determine how French hepatogastroenterologists manage cirrhotic patients with gastric varices. METHODS: Hepatogastroenterologists (n=1163) working in general or university hospitals received a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 155 hepatogastroenterologists (13.3%) from 112 centers (33.3%; 39/40 university hospitals, 73/296 general hospitals) answered. Primary prophylaxis was used by 98.1% of hepatogastroenterologists as follows: ß-blockers 96.1% (93.8 vs. 97.0%; university vs. general hospitals respectively; P=0.57), glue obliteration 16.9% (17.2 vs. 16.3%; P=0.88), and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) 8.0% (12.7 vs. 4.6%; P=0.12). To manage bleeding, university hospitals had greater local access to glue obliteration (95.4 vs. 68.2%; P<0.001) and TIPS (78.5 vs. 3.5%; P<0.001). Early TIPS was proposed by 53.6% (72.1 vs. 39.2%; P<0.001). Glue obliteration was performed under general anesthesia (86.1%) using Glubran (43.1%) or Histoacryl (52.9%), and lipiodol (78.8%) with varying degrees of dilution (1 : 10 to 3 : 4). The injected volume per varix varied widely (1-20 ml). Glue obliteration, band ligation, or both were used by, respectively, 64.2, 18.2, and 17.5% of practitioners. Almost all hepatogastroenterologists (98%) performed secondary prophylaxis: ß-blockers 74.7% (75.0 vs. 74.4%, university vs. general hospitals; P=0.93), glue obliteration 66.0% (76.9 vs. 57.6%; P=0.013), and TIPS 30.0% (39.1 vs. 23.3%; P=0.037). CONCLUSION: The management of gastric varices in France is heterogeneous across centers. University hospitals have better access to techniques such as glue obliteration and TIPS. As bleeding from gastric varices has a poor outcome, guidelines should be established to standardize clinical practices and design further studies.

Comparação do curativo compressivo vs. pulseira hemostática após cateterização por via radial / Comparison of conventional compressive dressings vs. wristband devices after catheterization by radial approach

Introdução: Dispositivos dedicados à compressão do sítio de punção radial adicionam custo ao procedimento e não foram adequadamente comparados aos curativos compressivos. Avaliamos a efetividade e a segurança de ambas as formas de hemostasia em pacientes submetidos à cinecoronariografia e/ou intervenção coronária percutânea na prática diária. Métodos: Estudo prospectivo, multicêntrico e não randomizado, que incluiu pacientes consecutivamente submetidos a procedimentos por via radial. A modalidade de compressão ficou a critério do operador e da disponibilidade das pulseiras hemostáticas. O objetivo primário foi a comparação da patência da artéria radial no sétimo dia pós-procedimento, aferida por meio do Doppler. Secundariamente, avaliamos a ocorrência de hemorragia/hematoma no sítio de punção durante a compressão, após a retirada do dispositivo e no sétimo dia pós-procedimento. Resultados: Foram avaliados 528 pacientes, 416 que usaram o curativo compressivo e 112 que usaram a pulseira hemostática. Na fase da retirada do introdutor e logo após sua remoção, notou-se uma incidência maior de sangramento no grupo curativo compressivo (13,4% vs. 0%; p < 0,001). Todos os sangramentos foram pequenos (tipo I ou II) e não necessitaram medidas adicionais. Aos 7 dias, observou-se apenas formação de pequenos hematomas no sítio da punção em 7,1% dos casos que utilizaram a pulseira de compressão. Não houve diferença nas taxas de patência da artéria radial (3,8% vs. 7,1%; p = 0,20). Conclusões: O uso de pulseira dedicada à hemostasia da artéria radial não resultou em maiores taxas de patência arterial tardia quando comparada ao curativo compressivo simples

Background: Wristband devices used in the compression of the radial puncture site add cost to the procedure and have not been adequately compared with conventional compressive dressings. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of both forms of hemostasis in patients undergoing coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention in daily practice. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study, which included consecutive patients who underwent procedures through radial access. The type of compression was at the interventionist's discretion and the availability of wristband devices. The main objective was to compare the patency of the radial artery on the 7th day after the procedure, measured by Doppler. Secondarily, the authors evaluated the occurrence of bleeding/hematoma at the puncture site during compression, after removal of the device and on the 7th day after the procedure. Results: This study evaluated 528 patients, 416 using conventional compressive dressings and 112 using wristband devices. When the sheath was removed and soon after its removal, a higher incidence of bleeding in the conventional compressive dressings group was observed (13.4% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). All bleeding events were small (type I or type II) and did not require further actions. At 7 days, there were only small hematomas at the puncture site in 7.1% of cases that used the wristband device. There was no difference in the patency rates of the radial artery (3.8% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.20). Conclusions: The use of wristband devices for radial artery hemostasis did not result in higher rates of late arterial patency when compared to conventional compressive dressings

Evolution in the Treatment of Delayed Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage: Surgery to Interventional Radiology.

OBJECTIVES: We summarized a single center's evolution in the management of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) from surgical toward endovascular management. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2013, 337 patients underwent Whipple procedures. Using the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) consensus definition, patients with PPH were identified and retrospectively analyzed for the presentation of hemorrhage, type of intervention, and 90-day mortality outcome measures. RESULTS: Management evolved from operative intervention alone, to combined operative and on-table angiographic intervention, to endovascular intervention alone. The prevalence of PPH was 3.0%. Delayed PPH occurred with a mean of 13.8 days. On angiography, visceral arteries affected were the gastroduodenal artery, hepatic artery, jejunal branches of the superior mesenteric artery, pancreaticoduodenal artery, and inferior phrenic artery. Ninety-day mortality for PPH was 20%. From early to recent experience, the mortality rate was 100% for operative intervention alone, 25% for combined operative and on-table angiographic intervention, and 0% for endovascular intervention alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our 10-year experience supports current algorithms in the management of PPH. Key considerations include the recognition of the sentinel bleed, the presence of a pancreatic fistula, and the initial operative role of a long gastroduodenal artery stump with radiopaque marker for safe and effective embolization should PPH occur.

Sequential therapy for non-thalamus supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhages.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the effectiveness of sequential therapy for non-thalamus supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (NTS-HICH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 110 patients with HICH. The patients were admitted 72 hours after disease onset, and 43 patients received sequential therapy. The length of hospital stay, treatment costs, incidence of pulmonary infections, mortality rates and Modified Rankin Score (mRS) 1 and 3 months after NTS-HICH were compared between patients who received sequential or non-sequential therapies. RESULTS: The length of hospital stay, treatment costs, and 1-month mortality rates were not significantly different between both groups. However, mortality rates at 3 months, incidence of pulmonary infection, and mRS at both 1 and 3 months were significantly better in patients who received sequential therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential therapy significantly improves the prognosis for patients with NTS-HICH.

The evolution of a purpose designed hybrid trauma operating room from the trauma service perspective: the RAPTOR (Resuscitation with Angiography Percutaneous Treatments and Operative Resuscitations).

Traumatic injury is the leading cause of potentially preventable lost years of life in the Western world and exsanguination is the most potentially preventable cause of post-traumatic death. With mature trauma systems and experienced trauma centres, extra-abdominal sites, such as the pelvis, constitute the most frequent anatomic site of exsanguination. Haemorrhage control for such bleeding often requires surgical adjuncts most notably interventional radiology (IR). With the usual paradigm of surgery conducted within an operating room and IR procedures within distant angiography suites, responsible clinicians are faced with making difficult decisions regarding where to transport the most physiologically unstable patients for haemorrhage control. If such a critical patient is transported to the wrong suite, they may die unnecessarily despite having potentially salvageable injuries. Thus, it seems only logical that the resuscitative operating room of the future would have IR capabilities making it the obvious geographic destination for critically unstable patients, especially those who are exsanguinating. Our trauma programme recently had the opportunity to conceive, design, build, and operationalise a purpose-designed hybrid trauma operating room, designated as the resuscitation with angiographic percutaneous techniques and operative resuscitation (RAPTOR) suite, which we believe to be the first such resource designed primarily to serve the exsanguinating trauma patient. The project was initiated after consultations between the trauma programme and private philanthropists regarding the greatest potential impacts on regional trauma care. The initial capital construction costs were thus privately generated but coincided with a new hospital wing construction allowing the RAPTOR to be purpose-designed for the exsanguinating patient. Many trauma programmes around the world are now starting to navigate the complex process of building new facilities, or else retrofitting existing ones, to address the need for single-site flexible haemorrhage control. This manuscript therefore describes the many considerations in the design and refinement of the physical build, equipment selection, human factors evaluation of new combined treatment paradigms, and the final introduction of a RAPTOR protocol in order that others may learn from our initial efforts.

What's new in operative trauma surgery in the last 10 years.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the latest operative trauma surgery techniques and strategies, which have been published in the last 10 years. Many of the articles we reviewed come directly from combat surgery experience and may be also applied to the severely injured civilian trauma patient and in the context of terrorist attacks on civilian populations. RECENT FINDINGS: We reviewed the most important innovations in operative trauma surgery; the use of ultrasound and computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of the penetrating trauma patient, the use of temporary vascular shunts, the current management of military wounds, the use of preperitoneal packing in pelvic fractures and the management of the multiple traumatic amputation patient. SUMMARY: The last 10 years of conflict has produced a wealth of experience and novel techniques in operative trauma surgery. The articles we review here are essential for the contemporary care of the severely injured trauma patient, whether they are card for in a level 1 trauma center or in a field hospital at the edge of a battlefield.

[Evolution of US military transfusion support for resuscitation of trauma and hemorrhagic shock]. / Évolution de la réanimation transfusionnelle du blessé hémorragique grave au sein des forces militaires américaines.

Military conflicts create a dynamic medical environment in which the number of severe trauma cases is compressed in both time and space. In consequence, lessons are learned at a rapid pace. Because the military has an effective organizational structure at its disposal and the logistical capacity to rapidly disseminate new ideas, adoption of novel therapies and protective equipment occurs quickly. The recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are no exception: more than three dozen new clinical practice guidelines were implemented by the US Armed Forces, with attendant survival benefits, in response to observation and research by military physicians. Here we review the lessons learned by coalition medical personnel regarding resuscitation of severe trauma, integrating knowledge gained from massive transfusion, autopsies, and extensive review of medical records contained in the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. Changes in clinical care included the shift to resuscitation with 1:1:1 component therapy, use of fresh whole blood, and the application of both medical devices and pharmaceutical adjuncts to reduce bleeding. Future research will focus on emerging concepts regarding coagulopathy of trauma and evaluation of promising new blood products for far-forward resuscitation. New strategies aimed at reducing mortality on the battlefield will focus on resuscitation in the pre-hospital setting where hemorrhagic death continues to be a major challenge.